Burgman 400 vs Burgman 650
- Data
- Benefactor
- Posts: 3312
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 12:43 pm
- Current Ride: Royal Enfield 350 Meteor
- Location: Starfleet Command, North Essex Branch, UK
Re: Burgman 400 vs Burgman 650
Absolutely guys, a bike either does it for you or not. Like anything else in life I guess.
Probably not ugly enough for the 'Ugly Bunch'! 
Been riding for 55 years & owned too many bikes to list here...
Been riding for 55 years & owned too many bikes to list here...
- Data
- Benefactor
- Posts: 3312
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 12:43 pm
- Current Ride: Royal Enfield 350 Meteor
- Location: Starfleet Command, North Essex Branch, UK
Re: Burgman 400 vs Burgman 650
mac, don't get me started on Harleys. As a tech, I've had experiences with Harley engines that no person should ever have to go through! I've never been the same since!! 
Probably not ugly enough for the 'Ugly Bunch'! 
Been riding for 55 years & owned too many bikes to list here...
Been riding for 55 years & owned too many bikes to list here...
-
avalon27
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2015 11:46 am
- Current Ride: Maxsym 600i
Re: Burgman 400 vs Burgman 650
I am enjoying my Burger 400 after a couple of years with a 650 - totally agree each has its strengths. For what I do the 400 is just that bit more a versatile all rounder - if it was continental blasting most of the time it would likely be the 650 or the Silverwing - which I had before the 650.
I prefer the 400 handling which surprised me - but suspect C of G lower. Only niggle is the slight 'single' lumpyness around 3000 revs in traffic - otherwise I just rev through it. J
I prefer the 400 handling which surprised me - but suspect C of G lower. Only niggle is the slight 'single' lumpyness around 3000 revs in traffic - otherwise I just rev through it. J
-
Bluebottle
- Benefactor
- Posts: 3184
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 2:50 pm
- Current Ride: Burgman 400 ZA L0
- Location: Manchester UK
Re: Burgman 400 vs Burgman 650
For me the 400 has "enough" of everything I wanted (comfort, speed, space, simplicity).
From a "horses for courses" point of view I don't ride with a pillion so I don't need the extra oomph for that.
The 400 is about the most weight I want to put up with and I like the simplicity of a straight CVT. apart from a bit more performance I didn't feel the sigfiddy gave me anything for the extra cost.
From a "horses for courses" point of view I don't ride with a pillion so I don't need the extra oomph for that.
The 400 is about the most weight I want to put up with and I like the simplicity of a straight CVT. apart from a bit more performance I didn't feel the sigfiddy gave me anything for the extra cost.
WE ARE THE BURG resistance is futile
The Ugly Bunch-1
The Ugly Bunch-1
- Steve_D
- Benefactor
- Posts: 2097
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2012 5:46 pm
- Current Ride: Honda SH300i
- Location: East London/Essex
Re: Burgman 400 vs Burgman 650
That's what he tells all the ladies.Data wrote:
Globs is quite right about his saying "smaller is often better". Can't disagree on that in this case.
Paddle harder. I can hear banjo music!
Honda SH300i
Honda SH300i
-
Richard400B
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 3:48 pm
- Current Ride: S400 Burgman
- Location: Wakefield
Re: Burgman 400 vs Burgman 650
I've been on both doing some serouis miles...and overall I preferred the 400...more agile and easy to get about. The new 650 is lighter and more like the newer 400 but there is something missing with the bigger burger.
When I ride with the 650's on our rides im never left in the lurch or at the line at traffic lights, it's a overall brilliant machine! Just my opinion tho, I know my dad loves his but having experienced both my choice would be the 400...
When I ride with the 650's on our rides im never left in the lurch or at the line at traffic lights, it's a overall brilliant machine! Just my opinion tho, I know my dad loves his but having experienced both my choice would be the 400...
-
Gerard C
- Benefactor
- Posts: 849
- Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 1:38 pm
- Current Ride: Suzuki Burgman 650
- Location: Wakefield
Re: Burgman 400 vs Burgman 650
Ungrateful wretch! To be honest we make our choice and if we get it right for ourselves then its a good bike.
- frankiej1949
- Benefactor
- Posts: 571
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:23 pm
- Current Ride: Suzuki Burgman 650
- Location: Obrzycko Poland
- Contact:
Re: Burgman 400 vs Burgman 650
You're right G, ungrateful wretch
I think you should demote him to the 125 and let Gloria have the 400
Only joking Richard!
-
Richard400B
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Fri May 23, 2014 3:48 pm
- Current Ride: S400 Burgman
- Location: Wakefield
Re: Burgman 400 vs Burgman 650
Jealous of the skills!
ha ha... Glo's test on Tuesday. MOD2 ...fingers crossed
-
Jorgem
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2015 12:20 am
- Current Ride: Burgman 650 2015
Re: Burgman 400 vs Burgman 650
Interesting analysis and chat. Can't compare with a 400 but compared with my Downtown 300 is way better in riding performance and feel as well as comfort
Btw, just curious, what do you do that requires so much riding? [GRINNING FACE WITH SMILING EYES]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Btw, just curious, what do you do that requires so much riding? [GRINNING FACE WITH SMILING EYES]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk