Re: Old 80's Honda Auto's
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 10:44 am
The apparent performance has probably got more to do with the petrol than anythign else.
Us oldies easily remember the 4 star stuff which was infinitely better than this modern eco rubbish with it's reduce octane value, and additions of wood alcohol, surgical spirit, turpentine, or whatever it is they put in it these days. You need about an extra 15-20% extra engine size to get an equivalent performance.
I had a Honda 250G5 in the seventies, which wasn't renound as being the best, most reliable or fasted Honda ever produced, and even that would scarily do over a ton indicated. You'd be hard pushed to find a standard road bike of equivalent size that would do anywhere near that now.
2 strokes were certainly quicker off the line. Not sure that they went faster in those days though.
Us oldies easily remember the 4 star stuff which was infinitely better than this modern eco rubbish with it's reduce octane value, and additions of wood alcohol, surgical spirit, turpentine, or whatever it is they put in it these days. You need about an extra 15-20% extra engine size to get an equivalent performance.
I had a Honda 250G5 in the seventies, which wasn't renound as being the best, most reliable or fasted Honda ever produced, and even that would scarily do over a ton indicated. You'd be hard pushed to find a standard road bike of equivalent size that would do anywhere near that now.
2 strokes were certainly quicker off the line. Not sure that they went faster in those days though.