Page 2 of 3
Re: Licenced to confuse
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 9:41 pm
by Deleted User 796
mdk1 wrote:andyscooter wrote:can you get rougher or cheaper then jodie marsh

Jordan???
Kerry Katona?
Re: Licenced to confuse
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:15 am
by Shifty2604
Surely that would be like sliding a hot dog down a hallway?
Re: Licenced to confuse
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 5:57 pm
by Deleted User 796
A well used hallway with worn carpets and bowed walls
Re: Licenced to confuse
Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 6:05 pm
by andyscooter
thats about the same level
supose kerry katona

Re: Licenced to confuse
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:00 am
by unchained
I can see the reasoning behind these new rules but, as 99% of the bike deaths in this area are men in their middle ages I doubt they will save many lives.
Bob
Re: Licenced to confuse
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 11:42 am
by monty9120
i was 17 when i passed my test by 19 i had an unrestricted bandit 600. i seemed to be able to handle it
at 23 i share a ford ka with my missus as insurance is still stupid money
Re: Licenced to confuse
Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:17 pm
by gn2
I passed my test on a 250 at 18.
At 18 I rode a Triumph 750.
Roads had a lot less traffic back then.
Re: Licenced to confuse
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 2:27 pm
by richie the 1st
Passed my bike/car test way back in 1977.In 1979 bought my 1st Honda cbx1000 in red.When 20 years old.
Now much older riding a Honda sh125 scoot.

Re: Licenced to confuse
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 5:13 pm
by MrGrumpy
Off at a slight tangent, but this is worth reading by people who've recently passed their test.
http://www.motorcyclenews.com/MCN/News/ ... uninsured/
I'm sure I said I'd got my full licence from the day I passed my test! It all seems another insurance company con.
Re: Licenced to confuse
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 5:42 pm
by Bluebottle
MrGrumpy wrote:I'm sure I said I'd got my full licence from the day I passed my test! It all seems another insurance company con.
I wonder if the same happens with people that have an Auto restriction?