Scooter Station have a comparison of the C650 and 2013 Burger. ...
http://www.scooter-station.com/Comparat ... BMW-C.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
BMW wins, principally on its dynamic qualities, but Burger has better luggage space, better equipment and perhaps surprisingly, is better in town.
BMW 650GT vs 2013 Big Burger comparison
-
MrGrumpy
- Benefactor
- Posts: 7288
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 9:50 pm
- Current Ride: ADV350 Tmax mk3
- Location: Cumbria
-
DougL
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 582
- Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2010 10:19 pm
- Current Ride: R1200GS
- Location: Belfast
Re: BMW 650GT vs 2013 Big Burger comparison
I'm surprised that the Burger did so well to be honest. I much preferred the clutch on the TMAX to the one on the BMW, wet vs dry. My BV350 has also got a wet one, much, much better. Is the Burgman's clutch wet too?
-
maxine500
- Posts: 234
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:37 am
- Current Ride: T-Max Street Triple R
Re: BMW 650GT vs 2013 Big Burger comparison
Comparing the Beemer with the burger makes good sense. My ride on the Beemer, a good hour or more over fav twisties left it way behind my old tmax. For creature comforts and delightful suspension the Beemer excelled there tho.
-
terryvanman
- Benefactor
- Posts: 1094
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 7:01 pm
- Location: Malta
Re: BMW 650GT vs 2013 Big Burger comparison
I've had a wet crutch for years

Dear God,
Please send clothes for all those poor ladies
in Daddy's computer. Amen
Please send clothes for all those poor ladies
in Daddy's computer. Amen
- bornagainbiker
- Posts: 880
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 7:53 pm
- Current Ride: Honda Forza 300
- Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Contact:
Re: BMW 650GT vs 2013 Big Burger comparison
Only a 2 point difference. The BMW may have better performance and a few other positives but to get to the equipment level of the 2013 Suzuki Burgman 650 at £8,799 you need to spend £10,545 for their Highline version. In this real world economic climate that's a huge £1746 difference and justification to go for the BMW over the Suzuki would need serious consideration as to why? Admittedly I was expecting the new 2013 Burgman to be more radical to justify a possible change so early but will just have to wait and dream on......
-
MrGrumpy
- Benefactor
- Posts: 7288
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 9:50 pm
- Current Ride: ADV350 Tmax mk3
- Location: Cumbria
Re: BMW 650GT vs 2013 Big Burger comparison
Yeah...I think Suzuki have made a slightly mistake by updating the Burger, but not really doing much to it. It obviously still has its advantages - and the engine gearbox setup is still obviously competitive - but it wouldn't have taken a huge amount of effort to make significant improvements, even if they didn't get round to the redesign to put the flabby thing on a major diet!bornagainbiker wrote:Only a 2 point difference. The BMW may have better performance and a few other positives but to get to the equipment level of the 2013 Suzuki Burgman 650 at £8,799 you need to spend £10,545 for their Highline version. In this real world economic climate that's a huge £1746 difference and justification to go for the BMW over the Suzuki would need serious consideration as to why? Admittedly I was expecting the new 2013 Burgman to be more radical to justify a possible change so early but will just have to wait and dream on......
- bornagainbiker
- Posts: 880
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 7:53 pm
- Current Ride: Honda Forza 300
- Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Contact:
Re: BMW 650GT vs 2013 Big Burger comparison
My Suzuki dealer NE Motorcycles at Durham who services my 650 has after 50+ years decided as at 10th May 2013, are to hand in the towel with Suzuki. Sad.MrGrumpy wrote:Yeah...I think Suzuki have made a slightly mistake by updating the Burger, but not really doing much to it. It obviously still has its advantages - and the engine gearbox setup is still obviously competitive - but it wouldn't have taken a huge amount of effort to make significant improvements, even if they didn't get round to the redesign to put the flabby thing on a major diet!bornagainbiker wrote:Only a 2 point difference. The BMW may have better performance and a few other positives but to get to the equipment level of the 2013 Suzuki Burgman 650 at £8,799 you need to spend £10,545 for their Highline version. In this real world economic climate that's a huge £1746 difference and justification to go for the BMW over the Suzuki would need serious consideration as to why? Admittedly I was expecting the new 2013 Burgman to be more radical to justify a possible change so early but will just have to wait and dream on......
-
DougL
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 582
- Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2010 10:19 pm
- Current Ride: R1200GS
- Location: Belfast
Re: BMW 650GT vs 2013 Big Burger comparison
maxine500 wrote: My ride on the Beemer, a good hour or more over fav twisties left it way behind my old tmax.
That's just complete nonsense. I have found just the opposite, especially in comparison to the Mk3. Most of the continental scooter press rate it better than the 530 too....
-
MrGrumpy
- Benefactor
- Posts: 7288
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 9:50 pm
- Current Ride: ADV350 Tmax mk3
- Location: Cumbria
Re: BMW 650GT vs 2013 Big Burger comparison
...and Suzuki withdrew their franchise from David Sykes at Horden a while back as well. I'm tending to use more independent workshops for servicing these days. Fortunately we do have a few on Teesside.bornagainbiker wrote:
My Suzuki dealer NE Motorcycles at Durham who services my 650 has after 50+ years decided as at 10th May 2013, are to hand in the towel with Suzuki. Sad.
